Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports

Share this post

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Why Nehru signed and funded the Indus Waters Treaty that favoured Pakistan
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Politics

Why Nehru signed and funded the Indus Waters Treaty that favoured Pakistan

The Indus Waters Treaty gave Pakistan control over most of the Indus system waters, while subjecting India, the upper riparian, to severe restrictions

Apr 27, 2025

Share this post

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Why Nehru signed and funded the Indus Waters Treaty that favoured Pakistan
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
Portrait of Jawaharlal Nehru
Jawaharlal Nehru | Wikimedia Commons

In 1960, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru signed the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan — a deal that gave away control of 80% of the Indus system waters to India’s western neighbour. What’s more, India even paid £62 million to Pakistan for building infrastructure to use that water. Why did Nehru agree to such a lopsided deal? Here’s the explanation in five sharp points:


1. Cold War pressure

At the time, the United States and Britain were deeply invested in stabilising Pakistan as a Cold War ally against Soviet influence. The World Bank (IBRD), pushed by the US and UK, was anything but neutral — it aligned with Western strategic priorities. The pressure on India to sign the Indus Waters Treaty and avoid a prolonged water conflict was immense.

Read this article in Hindi

2. Fear of international isolation

Refusing a treaty risked India being painted as an aggressive, obstructive power, jeopardising its relations with Western powers and access to vital international loans, grants, and World Bank funding. Newly independent and economically fragile, India couldn’t afford diplomatic and economic isolation or the risk of another confrontation with Pakistan.

3. India’s idealistic vision of peace

Jawaharlal Nehru saw rivers as common natural resources meant for the collective good of humanity. India’s foreign policy establishment in the 1950s was also driven by a moralist, idealist, and anti-imperialist worldview. Hard-nosed realpolitik was then seen as an imperialist residue. This sounds naïve now — but within the Gandhian-Nehruvian moral framework, it was entirely consistent.

About us

4. A miscalculated bet on Pakistan

Scarred by the horrors of Partition, Nehru genuinely hoped the treaty would foster long-term peace and goodwill with Pakistan, viewing it as a diplomatic investment in regional stability. He might have believed that once relations normalised, India could renegotiate the arrangement on better terms. He clearly overestimated Pakistan’s long-term intentions and underestimated the strategic consequences of this concession.

5. India’s inability to harness its own waters

It was very difficult for India to divert the waters of the Indus system into its northern states because the mighty Pir Panjal mountain range stood in the way. In 1947, India also lacked the dams and infrastructure needed to store and use this water wherever possible before it flowed into Pakistan. Added to this were economic weakness, diplomatic pressure, and post-Partition instability, which made it politically impossible for India to avoid a quick settlement with Pakistan.

In hindsight, the Indus Waters Treaty was less a treaty of equals and more a product of Cold War coercion, Nehruvian idealism, and India’s desperate post-Partition vulnerabilities. In reasserting itself today, India is not reneging on a legacy — it’s trying to correct an imbalance history imposed upon it.

Subscribe to receive emails, bookmark, or comment.

Share this post

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Why Nehru signed and funded the Indus Waters Treaty that favoured Pakistan
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

Comments

User's avatar
Why is Gen Z creating its own language?
From new slang to the reinvention of tone and grammar, Gen Z is redefining how it interacts in an increasingly digital world
Feb 10
1

Share this post

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Why is Gen Z creating its own language?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Listen | Could ‘Trumpism,’ if not Donald Trump, be Canada’s future?
Trump’s dream of ruling Canada is far-fetched, but Pierre Poilievre’s rise as a potential PM fuels talk of Trump-style politics
Jan 15

Share this post

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
3:49
Could ‘Trumpism,’ if not Donald Trump, be Canada’s future?
Donald Trump has often suggested Canada should join the U.S. While unlikely, why does Canada seem to be moving toward Trump-style politics?
Jan 8

Share this post

Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Satyagrah | News • Analysis • Reports
Could ‘Trumpism,’ if not Donald Trump, be Canada’s future?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Ready for more?

© 2025 Satyagrah Network
Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.